← Back to comparisons

Swap execution comparison

Orkid vs Succinct

TL;DR: ZK prover network for verifiable computation. The fastest client-side ZK prover in the market. Proofs generated locally — your data never leaves your device. Orkid’s ZK prover runs entirely in the browser. Your data never leaves your device. Sub-50ms proof generation with no server dependency, no prover network latency, and no third-party trust assumption.

Launch Orkid Swap → See Succinct alternatives →
// QUICK FIT CHECK

Choose Orkid if

you want transparent 9 bps fees, gasless swaps, MEV protection, and surplus returned to you on Base, Ethereum, or Unichain.

Choose Succinct if

Rollups, bridges, and protocols needing server-side proof generation at scale.

Decision table

At a glance

Comparison table for Orkid and Succinct
Category OrkidSuccinct
Category Client-Side PrivacyZero-Knowledge Proofs
Funding Private$68.8M raised
Core offering Sub-50ms proof generation in-browser. No server-side trust required. Privacy-preserving computation with verifiable outputs.Succinct builds a prover network for zero-knowledge proofs. Their infrastructure generates proofs server-side, enabling ...
Best for Browser-native zero-knowledge proofs under 50ms.Rollups, bridges, and protocols needing server-side proof generation at scale.
Not ideal for Teams that need a single-purpose tool, not a platform.Applications requiring client-side privacy where data must never leave the user’s device.

Where Succinct leads

Zero-Knowledge Proofs

Succinct has its own strengths. Here is where it performs well:

  • Well-funded with strong investor backing.
  • Prover network infrastructure for large-scale proof generation.
  • Supports multiple proof systems and chains.
  • Good developer tooling and documentation.

Where Orkid leads

Transparent execution and surplus return

The fastest client-side ZK prover in the market. Proofs generated locally — your data never leaves your device.

  • Integrated platform — the pillar connects to 6 other pillars, not just standalone.
  • Sub-50ms proof generation in-browser. No server-side trust required. Privacy-preserving computation with verifiable outputs.
  • The fastest client-side ZK prover in the market. Proofs generated locally — your data never leaves your device.
  • Defense-eligible — SAM.gov registered, CAGE 18NQ1.

Best fit

Who should choose Succinct

  • Rollups, bridges, and protocols needing server-side proof generation at scale.

Best fit

Who should choose Orkid

  • Teams who need an integrated platform, not just a single-purpose tool.
  • Organizations that need audit-ready, defense-eligible infrastructure.
  • Buyers who want the full stack: AI, ZK, swaps, credit, intelligence, settlement, and defense.
// SWITCHING PATH

Migration view

Switching from Succinct

If you need client-side privacy, Orkid’s browser-native prover eliminates the server round-trip. If you need server-side proof generation at rollup scale, Succinct may be a better fit — the two are complementary, not exclusive.

Next step

Explore the Client-Side Privacy

The fastest client-side ZK prover in the market. Proofs generated locally — your data never leaves your device.

See Succinct alternatives → Explore ZK pillar → All pillars →
LLM Resource Index llms.txt